MHG1659 - Keiss Broch
No summary available.
Type and Period (1)
- BROCH (Iron Age - 550 BC to 560 AD)
Harbour Mound, Keiss, ND36SE0002
Keiss Broch originated as 1st phase broch - 1st centuries BC and AD - and was subsequently modified and re-used about 2nd century AD, and again about the 3rd century AD. 2nd century re-occupation involved blocking of original seaward-facing entrance and creation of another on NE. 3rd phase of occupation involved rebuilding of outer wall, blocking of NE entrance and re-opening of original entrance, also building of an internal scarcement. During this phase, or possibly later, interior of broch was divided by slab structures and paved at varying levels, while externally various sprawling enclosures were created. In 1910, the broch wall survived internally to a height of about 5ft, the height of scarcement, except on N where it stood 8ft high. On the exterior the maximum height was 5ft 6ins. Excavation by Sir Francis Tress Barry produced, among more usual broch finds, two fragments of 2nd century Samian ware and sherd of 3rd century Rhenish ware. Finds, which were unstratified, are in NMAS.
Feachem (1963) notes remains of what might have been a primary outwork a short distance to NE of broch. Anderson notes the foundations of a large rectangular building a little to S of the broch. This is probably analagous to those at the 'Road Broch' (ND36SW 1) and 'Whitegate Broch' (ND36SE 3).
A Young 1964; RCAHMS 1911, visited 1910; R W Feachem 1963; J Anderson 1901.
ND36SE 2 3531 6108.
This broch has been severely mutilated, and seaward entrance is no longer apparent although entrance on NE can still be traced. The internal scarcement and the rebuilt outer wall are evident only in N segment, and southern gallery can still be traced with a possible cell alongside, together with the remains of several internal structures, the form of which could not be ascertained. The external enclosures are now greatly mutilated. Midden material is evident in and around the walls. No trace could be found of the primary outwork to the NE, mentioned by Feacham. Now in an undulating pasture field. The foundations of building mentioned by Anderson appear to be relatively modern.
Resurveyed at 1:2500. Visited by OS (R D) 14 September 1965.
Classification of Roman material. A S Robertson 1970.
Keiss Broch (NR) OS 1:10,000 map, (1973)
Keiss Broch is as described by the previous field investigator.
Visited by OS (N K B) 22 July 1982.
The results from the late nineteenth century excavation of this broch suggest that it was rebuilt on several occasions. The original seaward facing entrance, with its huge triangular lintel, was blocked and replaced by another one. However in the last phase of use, the outer wall was rebuilt, the second entrance blocked and the first one re-opened. (57)
The inside of the broch had a sequence of paved floors, on top of which a layer of rubbish had built up, before the next floor was laid. Overall, the rubbish from the occupation of the broch, was 2.1m deep. It included two sherds of second century AD Roman pottery, which was probably made in France. (56)
Armit, I., 1997. Celtic Scotland. Edinburgh: Batsford.
RCAHMS. 1911. Caithness. Edinburgh: HMSO, 154-5, No. 515.
Information from SCRAN Project, March, 2000
The broch was Scheduled by Historic Environment Scotland in 2016. <1>
A long handled antler comb from the site was radiocarbon dated in 2008, but only published in 2017 as part of the National Museum of Scotland's radiocarbon dating program of items from their collections. <2>
- --- Text/Publication/Article: Anderson, J. 1901. 'Notices of nine Brochs along the Caithness coast from Keiss Bay to Skirza Head, excavated by Sir Francis Tress Barry, Bart., MP., of Keiss Castle, Caithness', Proc Soc Antiq Scot Vol. 35 1900-1, p.112-48. Proc Soc Antiq Scot. 112-48. 127; plan.
- --- Text/Publication/Article: Robertson, A S. 1970. 'Roman finds from non-Roman sites in Scotland', Britannia Vol. 1 1970, p.198-226. Britannia. 198-226. table 2.
- --- Text/Publication/Article: Hartley, B R. 1972. 'The Roman occupations of Scotland: the evidence of samian ware', Britannia Vol. 3 1972, p.1-55. Britannia. 1-55. 54, No. 3.
- --- Text/Publication/Volume: Feachem, R W. 1963. A Guide to Prehistoric Scotland. 1st. 164.
- --- Text/Report: RCAHMS. 1911. The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments and Constructions of Scotland. Third report and inventory of monuments and constructions in the county of Caithness. . 154-5, No. 515; plan.
- --- Text/Designation Notification/Scheduled Monument: Historic Environment Scotland. 2016. Changes to the Schedule of Monuments: SM13623: Keiss Broch. Historic Environment Scotland. Digital.
- --- Text/Publication/Article: Young, A. 1964. 'Brochs and duns', Proc Soc Antiq Scot Vol. 95 1961-2, p.171-98. Proc Soc Antiq Scot. 171-98. 180-1, 197.
- --- Text/Publication/Article: Samuel Laing, M.P., F.S.A. SCOT.. 1867. 'On the age of the "burgs" or brochs and some other prehistoric remains of Orkney & Caithness.', PSAS Vol. 7 1870, p.56-100. PSAS. 56-100. 56-100.
- <1> Text/Designation Notification/Scheduled Monument: Historic Environment Scotland. 2016. Changes to the Schedule of Monuments: 620, 889, 1827, 3145, 3403, 13619, 13621, 13623, 13637. Historic Environment Scotland. Digital.
- <2> Text/Publication/Article: Sheridan. A, et al. 2017. Radiocarbon Dates Associated with the Scottish History and Archaeology Department, National Museums Scotland, 2016/17. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland. 209-214. Paper (Copy). pg 210.
|Grid reference||Centred ND 3531 6107 (51m by 52m)|
- QUERN (Undated)
- VESSEL (Undated)
Related Monuments/Buildings (0)
Related Investigations/Events (0)
External Links (2)
- http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/SM13623 (View full on-line designation record)
- https://canmore.org.uk/site/9318 (View HES Canmore entry for this site)
Comments and Feedback
Do you have any more information about this record? Please feel free to comment with information and photographs, or ask any questions, using the "Disqus" tool below. Comments are moderated, and we aim to respond/publish as soon as possible.