MHG2637 - Barrow cemetery - Whitebridge
Summary
This site was formerly believed to be the site of an 18th-century military camp but is now recognised as a late prehistoric/early historic barrow cemetery with more recent additions. It is one of the best surviving examples in the country.
Type and Period (2)
- (Former Type) MILITARY CAMP (18th Century - 1701 AD to 1800 AD)
- BARROW CEMETERY (Late Iron Age to Pictish - 2 AD to 900 AD)
Protected Status
Full Description
A camp of soldiers was established in 1725 at Stratherrick to report on depredations by the clans. The ruins of it can be seen on a slightly elevated piece of ground, 200 yards by 54 yards, among birch trees flanking the River Fechlin, exactly west of the RC Chapel near Whitbridge.
T Wallace 1886, 1911 <1><2>
The remains of this military camp are at NH 4928 1711 where the footings of a number of rectangular and circular structures (? Tent sites) are visible in a clump of trees, together with some small earthen mounds and a corn-drying kiln.
Surveyed at 1/2500.
Visited by OS (R D) 4 June 1964
No change to previous field report.
Visited by OS (R L) 16 December 1969
These structures were re-examined in the light of new archaeological evidence.
The site is situated on elevated ground, and has been cut by an old, but now dry, channel of the river Fechlin, leaving the group of structures to the W on an island covered by a thin birch wood, and those to the E on a low grassy terrace below the military road.
Wallace's plan is too stylised, and he omits a number of other structures. The site has been cultivated since 1911, thus reducing the structure in height and making interpretation difficult. However, sufficient remains to show that they are a mixture of circular, rectangular, trapezoidal enclosures and mounds.
Wallace's Structure 1: A low circular mound, 1m in diameter and 0.2m high above an encircling ditch 1m wide and an outer bank 1.5m broad and 0.2m high. Near the centre is a mound of stones, possibly later dumping. Its E side has been partially destroyed.
Structure 2: Abutting immediately on the S side of the No.1 is a trapezoidal-shaped low mound enclosed by a ditch and outer bank. The mound measures 5.5m across its N side by 8.5m along its S side, by 7m N-S, and 02.m on height.
Structure 3: 8 metres W of Nos.1 & 2 is a square mound measuring 5 x 5m and 0.8m high, with vestiges of a 0.8m wide ditch at its base remaining on all but the S side.
Structure 4: A rectangular building footing with rounded corners measuring 13 x 5m, now appearing as a grassy platform 0.2m high, although stones around the perimeter indicate the course of the walls. Structure 5: Appears to be a ruined corn-drying kiln 5m in diameter at the W end of a rectangular barn measuring 10 x 5m. The kiln is situated on the edge of this escarpment.
Structure 6: A low circular mound 6m in diameter and 0.4m high above an encircling ditch 2m wide with an outer bank 1m broad and 0.2m high. There is a break in the bank in the NE arc (not SW as on Wallace's plan). There is no apparent causeway across the ditch.
Structures 7,8 & 9: Three stony mounds 6, 4.5 and 6.5m in diameter respectfully with no apparent ditches. They are about 0.7m high. Structure 10: A low, badly mutilated almost square mound measuring 5 x 6m and 0.1m in height with traces of a ditch and an outer bank bounding the N, W and S sides only, the ditch being 1.5m wide. The S side runs off obtusely from the W side.
Structure 11: A large stony mound measuring 10m N-S by 8m transversely and 1m high. Ploughing has cut away the mound on the W side. (It is not rectangular as on Wallace's plan).
Structure 12: One of a complex group of vague structures considerably ploughed down. It is a low rectangular mound measuring 6 x 6.5m bounded by a shallow ditch 0.8m wide and outer bank 1m broad and 0.1m high. Structure 13: Appears now as an open-ended rectangular enclosure formed by a stony bank 8m long on the S, 3m long on the E and 6.5 long on the N side.
Structure 14: A sub-rectangular structure 8.5m long E-W by 3m transversely, formed by a low stony bank. Its relation with No.12 seems to indicate that it is overlying the S angle of the latter, but at the same time its N side seems to have bent in an attempt to avoid destroying it. Additional features not noted by Wallace
Structure 15: A curving fragment of bank apparently forming an enclosure of indeterminate form or purpose, Structure 16: What appears to be badly mutilated remains of a square mound with enclosing ditch and outer bank, the mound being about 5.5m across and the ditch about 1m wide. c/f No.3. Structure 17: Vestiges of a rectangular building (?) measuring 10 x 4m. Its W end has been ploughed away.
Structure 18: A grassy platform 0.1m high and measuring 8 x 3.5m with some stone evident on the perimeter which may indicate a building foundation.
Conclusions: In comparing this site with the Cair Cemetery at Garbeg (NH 53 SW 15) near Drumadrochit, excavated by L M Wedderburn in 1974/5, certain analogies are apparent. The circular and square cairns strongly resemble a number of the features here eg Nos.1,2,3,6,10,12,16, except that the Garbeg sites are slightly smaller in size and do not appear to have outer banks (except in one instance). In addition, the angles of Nos.2,3,10 & 12 seem to have been cut away or never closed, but no corner stones were detected as at Garbeg.
The Stratherrick site has apparently been re-used in more recent times with the introduction of rectangular buildings, enclousres and kiln; but no reason for the utilisation of the circular and trapezoidal structures in the recent times can be given, so for the present, a prehistoric date is postulated. The stony mounds Nos.7,8,9 & 11 may be field clearance dumps, but their close setting within the complex tends to lean to their being probably funerary. Nos.4,5,13,14,15,17 & 18 appear to be associated with later agricultural activities.
Only excavation of some of these structures will determine their identity, but the irregularity of the complex makes the Military Camp tradition less certain now - a more probable location for such being at Whitebridge, 2 miles to the S, where it has been suggested that the Hotel may have been a Kingshouse.
Surveyed at 1:2500.
Visited by OS (J L D) 20 June 1979
The site was surveyed by RCAHMS in 1982. <3>
Site photographed by Christine Yuil, 10/2002 <4>
This site is one of the best of its kind in the country. It consists of 4 square barrows, 2 ditched barrows, 5 unditched cairns and at least one indeterminate mound. The importance of the site relates to its upstanding remains - the remains visible here represent outstanding survival of this type of monument. The only other site of similar quality and survival to this is at Garbeg, near Drumnadrochit. Early confusion over the interpretation of this site came about through the lumping together of all the phases of use. The combination of elements indicates an early historic/late Iron Age date for the barrow cemetery. This is supported by the presence of extended inhumations. <5>
In 1999, keyhole excavation was undertaken across a threatened part of the site. A small trench was opened at the corner of one of the unditched cairns (no. 9). There was no trace of a surrounding kerb or bank or ditch. No artefacts were recovered relating to the construction of the cairn and no former ground surface was identified which could be used for soil/pollen analysis. <6> <7>
Sources/Archives (15)
- --- SHG1086 Text/Publication/Article: Ashmore, P. J.. 1981. Low cairns, long cists and symbol stones (PSAS Vol. 110). Proc Soc Antiq Scot Vol 110 1978-80. 346-55. 347, 351-2.
- --- SHG11609 Image/Photograph(s): Pictish Barrow Cemetery, opposite Dell Farm, Stratherrick.. Colour Slide; Digital Image. .
- --- SHG13847 Image/Photograph(s): Pictish Barrow Cemetry, Dell Farm, Stratherrick.. Colour Slide; Digital Image. .
- --- SHG3850 Image/Photograph(s)/Aerial Photograph: B/W Negative. .
- --- SHG3851 Image/Photograph(s)/Aerial Photograph: B/W Negative. .
- --- SHG4073 Image/Photograph(s)/Aerial Photograph: B/W Negative. .
- --- SHG4074 Image/Photograph(s)/Aerial Photograph: B/W Negative. .
- --- SHG4075 Image/Photograph(s)/Aerial Photograph: B/W Negative. .
- <1> SHG1192 Text/Publication/Article: Wallace, T. 1886. Notes on ancient remains in the Beauly Valley, Inverness-shire. Proc Soc Antiq Scot Volume 20. 340-55. 353-5.
- <2> SHG1207 Text/Publication/Article: Wallace, T. 1911. 'Notes on some sculptured slabs and headstones in the churchyards of Glenconvinth and Kirkhill, Inverness-shire'. Proc Soc Antiq Scot Volume 45. 309-14. 327-8; plan 327.
- <3> SHG833 Text/Publication/Article: Stevenson, J. B.. 1984. Garbeg and Whitebridge: two square-barrow cemeteries in Inverness-shire (BAR Vol. 125). Pictish studies: settlement, burial and art in Dark Age Northern Britain (BAR Vol. 125). 145-50. 145-50.
- <4> SHG23722 Verbal Communication: Aitken, J. Comments by Jacquie Aitken, SMR Assistant. 22/01/2004.
- <5> SHG23721 Text/Manuscript: Cameron, K. 2003. Unpublished notes for guided walk. Digital.
- <6> SHG23040 Text/Publication/Serial: Turner, R (ed). 2000. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland - New Series, Volume 1, 2000. Paper (Original). p 49.
- <7> SHG21014 Text/Report/Fieldwork Report: Alexander, D.. 2000. Deall Farm, Whitebridge, Highland: Cairn Excavation. Centre for Field Archaeology, Univ of Edinburgh. 29/09/2000. Paper and Digital.
Map
Location
Grid reference | Centred NH 4930 1714 (283m by 368m) (2 map features) |
---|---|
Map sheet | NH41NE |
Civil Parish | BOLESKINE AND ABERTARFF |
Geographical Area | INVERNESS |
Finds (0)
Related Monuments/Buildings (2)
Related Investigations/Events (1)
External Links (3)
- http://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/9032/9000 (View published PSAS Vol. 110 article online)
- http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/SM4536 (Online designation description (Historic Environment Scotland))
- https://canmore.org.uk/site/12281 (View HES Canmore entry for this site)
Comments and Feedback
Do you have any more information about this record? Please feel free to comment with information and photographs, or ask any questions, using the "Disqus" tool below. Comments are moderated, and we aim to respond/publish as soon as possible.